Food is fashionable? Not in Congress.

Just when things were looking up — more money for school lunch, a new plate instead of a food pyramid – Congress steps up with a really bad idea. Today, the House is set to vote on bill that would cut funds for food safety inspections and eliminate federal food assistance for some of the most vulnerable Americans.

The bill is H.R. 2112, or the 2012 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. Passed out of committee on May 31, it funds a vast assortment of programs from SNAP (formerly known as food stamps) and WIC, which supports the pregnant and nursing women and young children, to the USDA’s food inspection service and Michelle Obama’s pet project, the Healthy Food Financing Initiative that aims to make healthy foods more available in low-income neighborhoods.

Thanks to the first lady, food policy has become fashionable. But the new bill proves the food lobby isn’t yet strong enough to keep hatchet-wielding reps who want to boost their deficit-cutting credentials. In a statement late Monday night, the Obama administration voiced “serious concerns,” about the bill, noting that cuts to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service might require the agency to furlough inspectors — hardly wise when the massive E.coli outbreak in Europe is a reminder of the vulnerability of the global food system.

Anti-poverty groups, meanwhile, are panicked. If passed, mandatory food funding will be cut $46.5 million, with California, Texas, Florida, New York and Illinois taking the biggest hits. Reductions to federal nutrition programs could push more people — 130,000 seniors, and as many as 475,000 pregnant or nursing women, infants, and children, according to hunger relief charity Feeding America — to local charities for food assistance. This, at the time when other new cuts will slash the availability of government commodities that are distributed to church food pantries, soup kitchens and other local charities.

The only good news is that the Senate still must craft its own spending bill before legislation goes to the president. It’s a chance, albeit a small one, to apply a little sense to the vicious debate over dollars and cents.

This entry was posted in Food Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Posted June 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM | Permalink

    Thank you for shedding light on this issue. The house is debating right now and it is nerve-wracking that these most vulnerable of our citizens may lose much needed benefits.

    Thanks again!

    Dan Michel
    Feeding America

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • About Me

    Jane BlackI am a Brooklyn-based food writer who covers food politics, trends and sustainability issues. My work appears in the Washington Post, (where I was a staff writer), the New York Times, Slate, New York magazine and other publications. On this site, you will find my blog and links to my written work and my Washington Post column, Smarter Food.
      

  • Follow Me on Twitter